The Importance of Proper Data Analysis in Groundwater Monitoring

Groundwater monitoring is a critical aspect of environmental assessment, resource management, and contamination cleanup efforts. Accurate data analysis not only informs stakeholders of current conditions but also guides remediation and protection strategies. This article delves into the best practices and challenges in analyzing data from groundwater samples, with a focus on the treatment of passive samples.

Best Practices in Data Analysis

Groundwater monitoring data offers a snapshot of the subsurface environment’s health. Best practices in data analysis involve:

  • Temporal Consistency: Regular sampling provides a timeline of data that can reveal trends.
  • Spatial Accuracy: Precise location mapping ensures data relevance to specific contamination sites or aquifers.
  • Analytical Precision: Utilizing accredited laboratories and validated methods for analysis guarantees the reliability of data.

However, challenges abound. Data variability due to seasonal changes, cross-contamination risks during sampling, and the complexity of subsurface geology can skew results. Addressing these requires a methodical approach to sampling and analysis.

Groundwater monitoring projects encounter a variety of contaminants ranging from volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to heavy metals and emerging contaminants like PFAS and 1,4 Dioxane. Each type of contaminant presents unique challenges and considerations in data analysis, often requiring specialized approaches to ensure accurate assessment and interpretation.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Challenges:

  • Sample Preservation: VOCs are prone to evaporation and degradation. Therefore, maintaining the integrity of the sample from the field to the laboratory is crucial.
  • Detection Limits: Many VOCs are harmful at very low concentrations, necessitating highly sensitive analytical methods.

Considerations:

  • Method 8260: This is a standard EPA method for analyzing VOCs using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
  • Low-Flow Sampling Techniques: These can be used alongside passive sampling to reduce disturbance of the sample and prevent loss of VOCs.

Heavy Metals

Challenges:

  • Particulate Association: Metals can be present in dissolved form or bound to particles, and distinguishing between these forms is essential for accurate risk assessment.
  • Oxidation States: The toxicity and mobility of metals can vary significantly with their oxidation state, which can change during sampling and storage.

Considerations:

  • Sequential Extraction Procedures: These are used to differentiate between the speciated forms of metals.
  • Acidification: Adding acid to samples can preserve metals in their dissolved state for analysis.

PFAS

Challenges:

  • Diverse Chemical Properties: These contaminants have a wide range of chemical properties and behaviors in the environment, making standardized analysis difficult.
  • Difficulty to Destroy: PFAS are widely known as “forever chemicals” due to their lack of degradation and difficulty to destroy. Reliable and cost effective remediation methods are currently non-existent and are a focus for many environmental companies today.
  • Unknown Health Impacts: The health impacts of many emerging contaminants at trace levels are not well understood, complicating risk assessment.

Considerations:

  • Advanced Analytical Techniques: Techniques such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are often required for these contaminants.
  • Low Cost Investigation: Due to the low MCLs announced by the EPA for PFAS in drinking water, it is important that companies find technologies and adopt practices that decrease the cost of determining if PFAS is present. This will allow the allocation of more funds toward site remediation and cleanup.

Nutrients (Nitrogen, Phosphorus)

Challenges:

  • Biological Activity: Nutrients are subject to biological uptake and transformation, which can rapidly change concentrations.
  • Eutrophication Risk: Elevated levels can lead to eutrophication, and pinpointing sources is essential for mitigation.

Considerations:

  • In Situ Sensors: These can provide real-time monitoring of nutrient levels.
  • Isotopic Analysis: Nitrogen and phosphorus isotopes can help trace nutrient sources and pathways.

Organic Matter

Challenges:

  • Complex Mixtures: Natural organic matter consists of complex mixtures of thousands of different chemicals, complicating analysis.
  • Interference with Contaminant Measurements: Organic matter can bind with contaminants, affecting their detection and interpretation.

Considerations:

  • Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analysis: This provides a measure of the organic content in a sample and can be a proxy for organic matter.
  • UV-Visible Spectroscopy: This can help characterize organic matter and understand its interactions with contaminants.

Proper data analysis begins with your sampling method and choosing the method that best suits the contaminates you are dealing with.

Passive Sampling: Revolutionizing Groundwater Data Collection

Passive groundwater sampling is an innovative method that offers several advantages over traditional techniques like pump-and-purge or low-flow sampling. This method uses a no-purge approach, allowing for the collection of samples without the need to remove large volumes of water. This reduces sample turbidity and avoids the disruption of the natural chemical conditions of the groundwater.

Benefits of Passive Sampling:

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces time in the field and the volume of water needing disposal or safe storage.
  • Data Integrity: Minimizes disturbance to the water column, leading to representative samples that do not bias the sample.
  • Enhanced Safety: Lowers the risk of exposure to contaminants for field technicians.

Data Interpretation: Navigating the Complexities

Proper interpretation of groundwater data from passive sampling is paramount. It involves understanding the geochemistry of the site, the behavior of contaminants, and the potential for biodegradation or natural attenuation. Analysts must consider:

  • Contaminant Distribution: Recognizing the heterogeneous distribution of contaminants can affect sampling strategies.
  • Geochemical Indicators: Parameters such as pH, redox potential, turbidity, and conductivity can provide insights into subsurface conditions.
  • Time-Series Analysis: Evaluating changes over time can help distinguish between transient spikes and stable contamination levels.

Advancing Groundwater Monitoring with Passive Sampling

By offering an accurate representation of in-situ conditions, passive sampling can equip you with the data necessary to make informed decisions about remediation efforts and groundwater management.

The analysis of groundwater data, particularly from passive samples, is a cornerstone of effective environmental stewardship. Adhering to best practices in sampling and analysis, and overcoming the inherent challenges, ensures the protection of this vital resource for future generations.

Understanding Passive Diffusion Bags (PDBs)

More than 20 years ago Passive Diffusion Bags (PDBs) were introduced as a more streamlined, cost-effective solution for sampling for Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) concentrations in groundwater monitoring wells. Passive diffusion samplers have become widely used in the years since their introduction, leading to the development and use of samplers using membranes with different pore sizes that can accurately sample for all contaminants, including, metals, inorganics, ionic compounds, SVOCs and emerging contaminants such as 1,4 Dioxane and PFAS.

PDBs are typically 18 to 28-inch-long flexible, tubular “bags”, made from, semi-permeable, polyethylene membranes. They are filled with deionized water, sealed, and deployed on a weighted tether into the saturated screen interval of 1-inch and larger monitoring wells.

The key principle behind PDBs is that contaminant molecules dissolved in water will naturally diffuse or “flow” from areas of higher concentration to lower concentration if there is a pathway through which the molecules can move. When PDBs are deployed, contaminants in the groundwater diffuse through the microscopic pores in the membrane and equilibrate with the deionized water inside the bag over about 2-3 weeks’ time.

Once equilibrium is reached, the concentrations in the PDB continually adjusts to the surrounding groundwater concentrations so that the sampler always represents the constituents of the last several days of residence time.

That means PDBs can be installed at one sampling event and left in-place, indefinitely, until the next sampling event and then recovered with a representative sample. No bailing, no pumping, no waiting for parameters to stabilize. Simply pull out the sampler and discharge into a sample container.

Ideal Applications of PDBs

PDBs are particularly well-suited for specific types of environmental sites:

Contaminated Sites: Ideal for monitoring pollutants, PDBs can provide accurate readings of contaminant levels over time, essential to assist in tracking contaminant migration and remediation efforts.

Risk Assessment Sites: PDBs can be deployed to evaluate whether there is groundwater contamination flowing through a site’s underground aquifer. PDBs are with wide-ranging contaminant capability are selected for application at solid waste locations, UST sites and monitoring networks across all industries.

Large Sites with Many Wells: Substantial cost-savings roll-up as more wells convert to passive sampling and reduce the time/labor demand.

Remote and High-Traffic Sites: Because Passive Diffusion Samplers are small, lightweight, and don’t need cumbersome support equipment, it’s easier to get to remote sites and in-and-out of high traffic areas in minutes, adding a safety component to passive sampling.

Slow-Recharge Wells:  No waiting for wells to recover from being pumped down and no concern about aerated samples in re-charging wells that have been pumped. Simply install at one event and recover at the next.

Benefits of Using PDBs

Time Efficiency: PDBs significantly reduce the time required for sample collection and processing. They can be left in situ for extended periods and maintain a dynamic equilibrium with the surrounding aquifer, allowing for accurate, representative data from the period when sample collection occurs.

Cost-Effectiveness: With fewer resources needed for sample collection and processing, PDBs offer a more economical solution compared to traditional groundwater sampling methods.

Ease of Use: PDBs are straightforward and easy to deploy and retrieve, making them accessible even for teams with limited experience in passive sampling methods.

Reduced Risk of Contamination: The closed system of PDBs minimizes the risk of sample contamination, ensuring reliable results.

Environmental Friendliness: PDBs are a more sustainable option, generating less waste and requiring fewer consumables than traditional methods.

Best Practices for Using PDBs

To maximize the effectiveness of PDBs in your groundwater sampling projects, consider the following best practices:

Sampler Selection: PDBs can be made with membranes of different porosity, allowing for accurate sampling of different types of compounds. Ensure the sampler you choose for your project aligns with your site’s contaminants of concern.

Proper Deployment: Ensure that PDBs are correctly placed in the monitoring wells and at the right depths to sample the targeted contaminants.

Deploy After Retrieval: Eliminate duplicate mobilizations at long term monitoring sites with multiple sampling events, by deploying your next event’s samplers into your wells after you’ve retrieved your prior event’s PDBs. The PDBs can stay in the wells uncompromised and will be ready for quick retrieval at your next event. 

Conclusion

Passive Diffusion Bags are a proven technology in groundwater sampling. Their ability to provide accurate, cost-effective, and efficient sampling makes them an invaluable tool for environmental consultants.

As the industry continues to evolve, embracing innovative technologies like PDBs will be crucial in staying ahead and delivering superior environmental monitoring services.

For more information read The Ultimate Guide to Passive Groundwater Sampling.

Q1: How can the deployment of PDBs be optimized for different types of environmental sites (e.g., urban vs. rural, shallow vs. deep groundwater)?

The deployment of Passive Diffusion Bags (PDBs) can be optimized for various environmental sites by considering specific site characteristics. In urban areas, where space and access might be limited, PDBs are advantageous due to their minimal setup requirements. They can be easily deployed in monitoring wells situated in confined spaces, which is often a challenge in densely built-up areas. For rural sites, PDBs are beneficial in reducing the frequency of site visits, which can be logistically challenging and costly due to remote locations.

When considering groundwater depth, PDBs are versatile. For shallow groundwater monitoring, they provide an efficient way to sample without extensive pumping, which can disturb the water table and produce large volumes of contaminated wastewater. In deeper wells, PDBs should be accurately placed at specific depths to target the contaminants of interest, considering factors like groundwater flow and contaminant concentration gradients. This targeted deployment is crucial in mining sites or areas with stratified contaminant layers.

In both urban and rural settings, it’s essential to understand the hydrogeology of the site. Knowledge of the groundwater flow, contaminant types, concentration variations, and sample volume requirements, can guide the optimal type and placement of PDBs in the wells.

Q2: What are some potential limitations or challenges of using PDBs in groundwater sampling, and how can they be addressed?

While PDBs offer several advantages for groundwater sampling, there are limitations and challenges to consider. One of the main limitations is the amount of volume that can be sampled at one sampling event. With any passive sampler, including PDBs, you are limited to sample the water that is within the fully saturated length of the well screen. PDBs can be built to sample up to 1-L per sampler, and multiple PDBs can be deployed on a single tether to obtain more sample volume. Users should understand that there are cases where saturated screens are too short to provide adequate sample volume for some laboratory methods.

Another challenge is the potential for biofouling or sediment buildup on the bags, especially in wells with high microbial activity or sedimentation. This can affect the accuracy of the samples. Regular maintenance and monitoring of the PDBs can help identify and mitigate these issues.

Q3: Can the data collected from PDBs be integrated with other environmental monitoring technologies to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a site’s condition?

Integrating data collected from PDBs with other environmental monitoring technologies can provide a more comprehensive understanding of a site’s condition.

Geospatial technologies, such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS), can be used to map and analyze the spatial distribution of contaminants. Combining PDB data with GIS allows for the visualization of contaminant plumes and identification of trends over time.

Additionally, integrating PDB data with real-time monitoring systems, like automated water quality sensors, can provide a more dynamic picture of groundwater conditions. These sensors can continuously monitor parameters like pH, temperature, and conductivity, offering immediate insights into changes in the groundwater environment. By combining PDB data with other monitoring tools, environmental consultants can gain a more holistic view of the site’s condition, enabling more informed decision-making for remediation and management strategies. This integrated approach can be key to effective environmental monitoring and management.

What are PFAS Chemicals?

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals that are manufactured and utilized in a variety of industries worldwide. Despite the commonality of these man-made substances including PFOA, PFOS, and GenX, PFAS have been shown to have a correlation with negative health effects.

The Risks Associated with PFAS - EON Products, Inc.

Where can you find it?

PFAS commonly finds its way into surface water, groundwater and drinking water supply from sources including landfills, wastewater treatment facilities, and even firefighter training area where PFAS in fire-fighting foams soaks into the soil and is carried away by runoff from rain. Once in the soil and water, this substance accumulates and finds its way into living organisms, such as plants and fish, and then up the food chain to humans. Food is often grown in soil that contain the substance, and prepared foods are often packaged in PFAS-coated wrappers. Many common household products contain the substance as well, including but not limited to: paint, polishes, waxes, cleaning products, and water-repellant fabrics. 

There is an extensive list of consumer products that contain these chemicals, including cookware, pizza boxes, stain repellants, and clothing.

What are the effects of PFAS?

Animals and the human body are not equipped to break down PFAS, which means these chemicals can build up in organs and tissues. Animals that have been exposed to PFAS exhibit changes in liver, thyroid, and pancreatic functions. Increased cholesterol levels are one of the leading effects of PFAS exposure in humans. Other consequences can include low infant birth weights, depreciated immune systems, thyroid hormone disruption from exposure to PFOS, and even can cancer from PFOA. 

How can you reduce PFAS exposure?

If you live in or near an area impacted by PFAS contaminants, you can check with local water boards to see if there are any advisories in effect for drinking water. the Interstate Technology Regulatory Commission (ITRC) is an organization of technical professional that have published Fact Sheets and informational documents on PFAS and other compounds that affect human health.

Additionally, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has made significant progress under the PFAS Action Plan to help states and local communities address the substance and its effects, and protect public health.

The Risks Associated with PFAS - EON Products, Inc.

EON’s solution

Much of the drinking water and agricultural irrigation in the U.S. comes from groundwater. Monitoring groundwater for PFAS and taking action to reduce the impact of contaminated groundwater is of critical importance to preventing its spread throughout the food chain. EON Products manufactures and provides passive groundwater samplers to environmental monitoring consultants, who then use these devices to accurately sample virtually any compound in the groundwater including; VOCs, Metals, Semi-Volatiles, 1,4 Dioxane, and Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Users experience all the ease of use and cost saving benefits of passive diffusion sampling plus verified performance on sample results for the low concentrations, to less than 2 parts per trillion, of some of the more commonly detected PFAS in the environment.

Our PDBs are made from materials that do not contain PFAS and have been listed as acceptable materials for sampling this substance. And, because they are immersed in the aquifer water for an extended time, concentrations in the groundwater are able to equilibrate with the PDB sampler materials before the sampler is removed, virtually eliminating the potential for low-bias caused by absorption to the sampler materials. 

For more information on our passive groundwater samplers for PFAS and other compounds of emerging concern, contact the experts at EON today.

See the Product in Our Store